data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36cb7/36cb7f214db44780051d4f0c878f633092c2ccf1" alt="Star trek federation fighter"
Also by the federation doctrine all personnel shall be massively over trained and have a generally unneeded competence to serve at nearly all positions on the ship.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bd71/2bd71c16e6cdc6ee4b50fe57e1286c62ea35a49a" alt="star trek federation fighter star trek federation fighter"
Sending people out in fighters almost sure to be destroyed by any enemy fire goes against federation values and doctrine. The Defiant-class might possibly be defined as a super heavy fighter.ģ. Anything a pure fighter can do can be done slightly worse by a multi-purpose shuttle and slightly better by a small ship that can do other things and has a peacetime use. It is a purely military equipment and as such would be vetoed by the pacifist faction.Ģ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5839/c583923fa336213f7326ee05397b8b924aef8864" alt="star trek federation fighter star trek federation fighter"
Expendable manned fighters would not be viable in the UFoP due to several factors:ġ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36cb7/36cb7f214db44780051d4f0c878f633092c2ccf1" alt="Star trek federation fighter"